Skip to content
Nobel Jews
Portrait of Herbert A. Hauptman
Photo: Dave Pape, Own work by the original uploader · Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Nobel Prize in Chemistry · 1985

Herbert A. Hauptman

A mathematician who, with Jerome Karle, cracked crystallography's phase problem so chemists could read molecular shapes from X-ray data.

The Nobel citation: “for their outstanding achievements in the development of direct methods for the determination of crystal structures”
Born
February 14, 1917, New York, NY, USA
Died
October 23, 2011, Buffalo, NY, USA
Shared with
Jerome Karle
Affiliation at the time
The Medical Foundation of Buffalo, USA

Chemistry prize

1985

Shared with 1 other laureate.

Age that year

68years

Born in 1917.

Sources cited

21

Fact-checked September 24, 2026.

  • Every one of his degrees was in mathematics, yet in 1985 he became the first mathematician to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
  • He and Jerome Karle published their method in 1953, but crystallographers largely ignored it for about ten years because the math was unfamiliar.
  • A colleague recalled that mapping a 15-atom antibiotic once took two years; with direct methods a 50-atom molecule took two days.
  • In 1970 he left the Naval Research Laboratory rather than move his work toward laser-guided missiles.
  • He made stained-glass models of complex geometric shapes; a permanent collection is kept at the Buffalo institute that bears his name.

The breakthrough

Direct methods: reading a crystal's missing phases from the X-ray data (1950-1956)

To learn a molecule's shape, chemists grow a crystal of it and shine X-rays through it. The rays scatter into a pattern of spots. Each spot carries two pieces of information: how bright it is, and its phase, meaning how far its wave crests are shifted compared with the others. Detectors record only the brightness. Without the phases, turning the spots back into a map of the atoms was slow, indirect guesswork, and one structure could take a year or more. Many scientists thought the missing phases could never be recovered from brightness alone. Hauptman, a mathematician, and Jerome Karle, a physical chemist, showed that they could. They started from two plain facts. The electrons that scatter X-rays can never be present in a negative amount, and a crystal gives far more spots than there are atoms to find. From these facts they built equations and probability rules that link the phases of groups of spots to the measured brightness, so the most likely phases can be worked out directly. It is like rebuilding a smudged word from many partial clues: no single clue is certain, but thousands of them together point to one answer. Their 1953 monograph set out the method. It became practical once computers could handle the heavy arithmetic.[1],[2],[3],[10],[20]

“There was a lot of resistance to it, mostly because it wasn't understood.”
Herbert A. Hauptman, Explaining to New York Times writer John Noble Wilford why direct methods took years to be accepted, as quoted in his Gale biography.[9]

What it meant for humanity

Direct methods turned crystal structure work from a craft practiced by a small group of experts into a routine tool that any trained scientist can use. When it announced the 1985 prize, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences noted that structure determinations of the previous 15 years in inorganic and organic chemistry, including the chemistry of natural products, had been carried out mostly with direct methods. The programs that brought the method into daily use, starting with MULTAN in the late 1960s and continuing with today's SHELX and SIR, use advanced versions of the Hauptman-Karle approach, and direct methods are run thousands of times a year. For most compounds that form good crystals, the phase problem is no longer an obstacle. The Cambridge Structural Database, the main archive of small-molecule crystal structures, held 1,362,809 entries at the start of 2025. A Buffalo colleague recalled that a simple 15-atom antibiotic once took two years to map, while a 50-atom molecule could be solved in two days with direct methods. The approach has been used to study hormones, vitamins, antibiotics and possible cancer drugs, and exact molecular shapes help chemists understand how drugs and their targets fit together. In Buffalo, Hauptman and his colleagues later built Shake-and-Bake, which extended direct methods to structures of a few hundred atoms and to the clusters of heavy atoms that help solve large proteins.

  • In 1985 the Nobel committee reported that most crystal structures solved in the previous 15 years, across inorganic, organic and natural-product chemistry, had been solved with direct methods.[3]
  • Direct methods are used thousands of times a year, and the Cambridge Structural Database held 1,362,809 small-molecule crystal structures on 1 January 2025.[11],[16]
  • A colleague said a simple 15-atom antibiotic once took two years to map; with direct methods a 50-atom molecule took two days.[9]
  • Shake-and-Bake, developed in Buffalo with Hauptman, solved test structures of up to 317 atoms in 1994, was later applied to small proteins such as lysozyme, and became one of the most successful tools for locating heavy atoms in proteins.[17],[18],[19]
  • His institute's chief executive told the Associated Press he doubted any drug developed in the previous 30 years had not been studied using methods derived from the prize-winning work.[5]

Impact in numbers

Hauptman's legacy is a mathematical key that opened the structures of small molecules to everyone. Before direct methods, solving a crystal structure was slow, indirect work for specialists; after the Hauptman-Karle theory was built into computer programs, it became a routine step used thousands of times a year, and the archive of small-molecule crystal structures has grown past 1.3 million entries. Chemists, drug designers and materials scientists rely on that knowledge of exact shapes every day. We make no quantified claim. Direct methods are one tool among many in the long chain that leads to a new drug or material, and they were made practical by others, including Isabella Karle, Michael Woolfson and the builders of fast computers. Any count of lives saved or dollars earned credited to Hauptman would be guesswork, so we describe the impact in words instead.

Fundamental scienceMathematicsHealth

No number is given here on purpose. Some contributions cannot be counted honestly, and we would rather describe them than invent a figure.

The double edge

No major harm is linked to direct methods, which reveal the shapes of molecules rather than making any product. Two smaller points deserve mention. The work grew up inside a US Navy laboratory, and the Defense Department was interested in using it to study rocket propellants; Hauptman himself left the laboratory in 1970 rather than shift to missile work, and he protested the Vietnam War. Credit was also contested. The Nobel announcement named earlier and later contributors, and many crystallographers believe Isabella Karle, who first showed that the method worked on real crystals, deserved a share of the prize.

  • Minor

    Military setting and weapons interest

    Direct methods were developed at the Naval Research Laboratory, and the US Defense Department was interested in using them to study rocket propellants. Hauptman left the laboratory in 1970 because he was unwilling to move his research toward laser-guided missiles, and his wartime experience led him to protest the Vietnam War.[5],[6],[9]

  • Minor

    Disputed credit for Isabella Karle

    Isabella Karle's symbolic addition procedure first showed that the Hauptman-Karle theory worked in practice. Jerome Karle and many other crystallographers believed her work deserved Nobel recognition, and the Nobel announcement itself named her, David Sayre, Michael Woolfson and others as important contributors.[3],[10],[11]

Against the odds

Hauptman grew up in the Bronx in a working-class Jewish family: his father was a printer and his mother sold hats in a department store. In his youth Harvard, Princeton, Yale and other leading universities kept their Jewish enrollment small, a practice that lasted until the 1960s, and many American medical schools had quotas for Jewish students. City College of New York, which charged no tuition, was the main road upward for many young people like him; one student of the era wrote that most of its students came from Jewish working-class or lower-middle-class homes. Hauptman later said he could never have gained the education his discoveries required without that free schooling. During World War II he served in the Southwest Pacific, where fire duty twice nearly cost him his life. After the war his new method met about a decade of disbelief from crystallographers who lacked the mathematics to follow it. We found no record of antisemitism aimed at him personally. His obstacles were those his generation of Jewish New Yorkers shared, plus a scientific field slow to trust an outsider's mathematics.

  • —

    Discrimination

    Leading private universities such as Harvard, Princeton and Yale admitted only a small number of Jewish students until the 1960s. Hauptman studied at tuition-free City College, where most students came from Jewish working-class homes, and said free tuition made his education possible.[9],[14],[15]

  • 1942

    War

    He served in World War II in the Southwest Pacific. Trained as a weather forecaster, he also served as a fire marshal in the Philippines, a post that twice nearly cost him his life.[5],[6]

  • 1953

    Other

    Crystallographers met the Hauptman-Karle method with skepticism and largely ignored it for about ten years, partly because few of them had the mathematical training to understand it.[9],[10],[11]

Jewish background

Both parents JewishIdentified as Jewish, secular

Hauptman was born in New York City to a Jewish family, the eldest son of Israel Hauptman, a printer, and Leah Rosenfeld Hauptman, a department store clerk. The Encyclopaedia Judaica includes him. He was an atheist and secular humanist who in 2003 signed the Humanist Manifesto III, yet he kept ties to Jewish institutions. He received a medal from the Jewish Academy of Arts and Sciences and became a fellow, took an honorary doctorate from Israel's Bar-Ilan University, and in 2000 received Hillel of Buffalo's Akiva Award. He gave his Nobel medal to the Judaic museum at Buffalo's Temple Beth Zion.[1],[6],[7],[8],[12],[13],[20],[21]

Key dates

  1. February 14, 1917

    Born in New York City, the eldest son of Israel Hauptman, a printer, and Leah Rosenfeld Hauptman.[1],[2],[6]

  2. 1937

    Earns a bachelor's degree in mathematics from the City College of New York.[1]

  3. 1939

    Earns a master's degree in mathematics from Columbia University.[1]

  4. November 10, 1940

    Marries Edith Citrynell, a teacher; they later have two daughters, Barbara and Carol.[1],[9]

  5. 1942

    Enters wartime service in World War II and later serves in the Southwest Pacific.[5],[6],[9]

  6. 1947

    Joins the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., and begins his collaboration with Jerome Karle.[1]

  7. 1950

    Publishes with Karle their first paper linking the phases of X-ray reflections to their measured strengths.[10]

  8. 1953

    Publishes with Karle the monograph Solution of the Phase Problem I, which sets out the probabilistic direct methods.[1],[8]

  9. 1955

    Receives a PhD in mathematics from the University of Maryland.[5],[6],[7]

  10. 1970

    Leaves the Naval Research Laboratory for the Medical Foundation of Buffalo; becomes its research director in 1972.[1],[5]

  11. October 16, 1985

    Named co-winner, with Jerome Karle, of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for direct methods of crystal structure determination.[2],[3],[4]

  12. 1994

    The Medical Foundation of Buffalo is renamed the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute in his honor and that of Helen Woodward-Rivas.[5],[6]

  13. 2003

    Signs Humanist Manifesto III, one of 22 Nobel laureates to do so.[12]

  14. October 23, 2011

    Dies in Buffalo, New York, at 94, having worked at his institute into his nineties.[2],[5]

Sources

  1. 1.Herbert A. Hauptman – Biographical · NobelPrize.org, 1985
  2. 2.Herbert A. Hauptman – Facts · NobelPrize.org
  3. 3.Press release: The 1985 Nobel Prize in Chemistry · The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences / NobelPrize.org, 1985
  4. 4.Herbert A. Hauptman – Nobel Lecture: Direct Methods and Anomalous Dispersion · NobelPrize.org, 1985
  5. 5.In Memoriam: Nobel Laureate and UB Professor Herbert Hauptman · University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 2011
  6. 6.Herbert Hauptman: Obituary · American Crystallographic Association History Portal, 2011
  7. 7.Nobel Laureate Hauptman · Hauptman-Woodward Research Institute, University at Buffalo
  8. 8.Hauptman, Dr. Herbert · Jewish Buffalo History Center (Buffalo Jewish Federation)
  9. 9.Hauptman, Herbert (Encyclopedia of World Biography) · Gale / Encyclopedia.com, 2018
  10. 10.Jerome Karle and Herbert Hauptman: The Phases and Magnitudes of the Structure Factors (Acta Crystallographica 1950) · Crystallography: Defining the Shape of Our Modern World, University of Illinois School of Chemical Sciences
  11. 11.Revisiting symbolic addition: a step-by-step introduction to manual direct methods · Acta Crystallographica Section E (via PubMed Central), 2026
  12. 12.Humanism and Its Aspirations: Notable Signers · American Humanist Association, 2003
  13. 13.UB Faculty Members Honored by Hillel of Buffalo · University at Buffalo News Center, 2000
  14. 14.New York Jews won't stop winning Nobel Prizes · The Times of Israel, 2012
  15. 15.Arguing the World: The New York Intellectuals | Irving Kristol (excerpt from Memoirs of a Trotskyist) · PBS
  16. 16.Cambridge Structural Database, 1 January 2025: CSD Entries Summary Statistics · Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 2025
  17. 17.Structure solution by minimal-function phase refinement and Fourier filtering. II. Implementation and applications (Weeks, DeTitta, Hauptman, Thuman, Miller) · Acta Crystallographica A (PubMed record), 1994
  18. 18.P1 Shake-and-Bake: can success be guaranteed? (Xu, Hauptman, Weeks, Miller) · Acta Crystallographica D (PubMed record), 2000
  19. 19.Rapid and automated substructure solution by Shake-and-Bake (Xu, Weeks) · Acta Crystallographica D (PubMed record), 2008
  20. 20.Herbert A. Hauptman · Wikipedia
  21. 21.Hauptman, Herbert Aaron (Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd ed.) · Gale / Encyclopedia.com, 2007

Fact-checked on September 24, 2026 by a separate AI fact-checking pass that re-opened the sources, with 5 corrections made. How we check

Suggest a correction