Elinor Ostrom

She showed that communities can share forests, fisheries and water without ruining them, and was the first woman to win the economics prize.

The Nobel citation: “for her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons”

Born: August 7, 1933, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Died: June 12, 2012, Bloomington, IN, USA
Shared with: Oliver E. Williamson
Affiliation at the time: Indiana University, USA; Arizona State University, USA

Economics prize

2009

Shared with 1 other laureate.

Age that year

76years

Born in 1933.

Sources cited

Fact-checked September 24, 2026.

She was the first woman to win the economics prize, though she always described herself as a political scientist rather than an economist.
Although she went to a Protestant Sunday school, as a young child she was circled by classmates who shouted antisemitic taunts at her because her father was Jewish.
Indiana University first hired her to teach American government at 7:30 a.m. on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.
In her lab experiments, strangers sharing a resource overused it, but simply letting them talk first cut the overuse, against game-theory predictions.
In Nepal, her team found that irrigation systems run by farmers grew more rice and shared water more fairly than systems run by the government.

The breakthrough

Showing that communities can govern shared resources themselves

In 1968 Garrett Hardin argued in the journal Science that anything many people share, such as a pasture, will be ruined, because each user gains by taking a little more. Experts saw two cures: hand the resource to private owners, or let the government run it. Ostrom asked what actually happens. Her doctoral research examined how water users around a Los Angeles groundwater basin organized to stop seawater seeping in. Later she gathered and systematically compared scattered case studies of fishing grounds, pastures, forests, lakes and irrigation canals. She found that users often write and enforce their own rules, and that some of these systems have lasted for centuries. She also studied the failures, and picked out what lasting systems have in common, which she called design principles; she later suggested that calling them best practices might have been clearer. They include clear limits on who may use the resource, rules suited to local conditions, users helping to make the rules, monitors who answer to the users, penalties that start small, cheap local ways to settle disputes, and outside authorities that respect the group's right to organize. Think of roommates sharing a fridge: the ones who agree on shelves, take turns checking and settle arguments at a house meeting rarely need a landlord to step in. Her laboratory experiments pointed the same way. Anonymous players overused a shared pool, but simply letting them talk reduced the overuse, and players paid their own money to fine others far more often than standard theory predicted.^{[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[10]}

“A core goal of public policy should be to facilitate the development of institutions that bring out the best in humans.”

Elinor Ostrom, From the closing section of her Nobel Prize lecture, delivered in Stockholm on 8 December 2009.^[4]

What it meant for humanity

Ostrom's work challenged a belief that had shaped policy toward shared natural resources. Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" had supported turning common lands over to private owners or replacing local arrangements with top-down government rules. Her evidence showed that the people who depend on a forest, fishery or canal can often manage it better than distant officials, and she warned against one-size-fits-all fixes of any kind. The Nobel committee's own examples show what is at stake. On the grasslands of inner Asia, state collective farms in China and Russia, and later privatized plots in Inner Mongolia, degraded land that traditional herding groups in Mongolia kept in better shape. In Nepal, modern concrete dams built by the government with foreign aid often failed, because farmers no longer needed each other to maintain them; harvests were frequently larger around the farmers' own stone-and-mud dams. Ostrom also built tools to test such claims: a common framework for analyzing rules and institutions, a coded database of 229 Nepali irrigation systems, and a long-term forest research network with more than 250 sites in 15 countries, run by researchers who live there. Her conclusions were careful. The committee stressed that user management is not always best, citing the waste caused by shared oil pools in Texas and Oklahoma in the 1930s. Her lasting contribution is a habit of mind: study how people actually govern themselves before redesigning their institutions from outside.

In Nepal, irrigation systems governed by farmers were in better repair, delivered more water to farmers at the tail end and grew more rice than government-run systems, a finding confirmed in an expanded database of 229 systems.^[4]
Across 163 forests, those legally protected by governments were no denser than other forests used for many purposes, and among 178 forest user groups, more monitoring by users went with denser forests.^[4]
The Nobel committee pointed to inner Asian grasslands, where state collectives and later privatization degraded land that traditional Mongolian herding groups kept in better condition.^[5]
Her forest research program built a long-term database of more than 250 sites in 15 countries, with data collected by trained scholars living in each country rather than by researchers flying in from the United States.^[2],[10]
Studying policing in 80 US metropolitan areas, her team found that areas served by many police departments were not the wasteful muddle reformers assumed, and large departments never outperformed small or mid-sized ones at patrol and other direct services.^[2],[4]
She supervised about 80 doctoral dissertations and published more than 300 articles and chapters. The Ostroms gave millions of dollars to Indiana University, including her Nobel prize money.^[11],[12]

Impact in numbers

Ostrom's contribution is understanding, so we record no quantified impact claim. She showed with evidence that shared forests, fisheries, pastures and water systems are not doomed, identified what long-lasting self-governed systems have in common, and warned policymakers against one-size-fits-all fixes, whether privatization or central control. Her frameworks and databases shaped research on natural-resource governance, public services and climate policy, and a 2010 review of 91 studies found her design principles well supported. But the forests and irrigation systems that thrive under local rules are built and run by their users, whose institutions often predate her work by centuries, and no published study measures how many hectares, harvests or livelihoods were protected because governments or aid agencies followed her findings. Any number we attached would be invented, so her impact is described here in words.

EnvironmentEconomyFundamental science

No number is given here on purpose. Some contributions cannot be counted honestly, and we would rather describe them than invent a figure.

The double edge

No harm caused by Ostrom's work is documented; the debate is about its limits. A 2010 review of 91 studies found her design principles well supported, but it also recorded three criticisms. The principles leave out outside forces such as markets, which can unravel local arrangements. They may not scale up from villages to regional or global problems. And they can treat communities as harmonious wholes, glossing over power, inequality and conflict among users. Critics also warned that the principles could be misused as a universal recipe, a danger Ostrom herself stressed. The Nobel committee likewise noted cases, such as shared oil pools in Texas and Oklahoma in the 1930s, where the failure to privatize caused great waste.

Minor
Design principles can be misused as a one-size-fits-all recipe
Reviewers warned that the principles might be treated as a magic bullet and imposed on settings they do not fit. Ostrom made the same point, arguing that no single policy works everywhere and that rules must be fitted to each social and ecological setting.^[4],[13]
Minor
Local lessons may miss markets, power and global scale
Critics argue the principles underplay outside pressures such as market integration, which has destabilized some community systems, may not transfer from local commons to much larger or global systems, and can hide conflict and inequality within user groups.^[13]

Against the odds

Ostrom was born in Los Angeles in 1933 and grew up poor during the Great Depression, raised by her mother after her parents divorced. Antisemitism grew in the United States through the 1930s, and restrictive immigration laws reflected a narrow view of who counted as a true American. Although she went to a Protestant church and Sunday school, schoolmates linked her to her Jewish father: she remembered being circled in the classroom and on the playground while other children shouted antisemitic taunts. She later said that experience, together with the barriers she met as a woman, gave her sympathy for people outside the center of civic life. The gender barriers were constant. As a girl she was advised against mathematics beyond algebra and geometry, and UCLA's economics department later discouraged her from pursuing a doctorate there. Employers asked the new graduate whether she could type and take shorthand. UCLA's political science faculty held a heated meeting criticizing the admission of her and three other women to a class of 40. In 1965 she followed her husband to Indiana; as she later wrote, it was very hard in those days for any department to hire a woman. Her first job there was teaching a 7:30 a.m. class, including on Saturdays.

—
Discrimination
As a young child she attended a Protestant Sunday school, but classmates linked her to her Jewish father's heritage, circling her in the classroom and on the playground and shouting antisemitic taunts. Antisemitism was rising across the United States in that decade.^[8],[14]
—
Poverty
She grew up poor in the Great Depression after her parents divorced. Her mother saw no reason to pay for college, so she worked in a library, a dime store and a bookstore to finish UCLA in three years without debt.^[2],[8],[10]
—
Discrimination
Steered away from mathematics as a girl, she was discouraged from an economics PhD at UCLA. In political science, faculty held a heated meeting criticizing the admission of her and three other women to a class of 40.^[2]
1965
Discrimination
When she moved to Indiana in 1965, it was, in her words, very hard in those days for any department to hire a woman. Her first post was a visiting job teaching introductory American government at 7:30 a.m. on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.^[2],[15]

What Jews faced around 2009

Open borders and a rising tide of attacks

With the Soviet Union gone, about 1 million emigrants from the former USSR eventually settled in Israel and 300,000 had reached the United States by 2000, and Syria let its last Jews leave in 1992. Terrorism against Jewish targets continued: bombings in Buenos Aires killed 29 at Israel's embassy in 1992 and 85 at the AMIA community center in 1994, and synagogues were attacked in Djerba in 2002 and Istanbul in 2003. About 1,000 Israelis were killed during the Second Intifada of 2000 to 2005, many in suicide bombings.

2008Attack on Mumbai's Chabad House. During the coordinated terror attacks on Mumbai in November 2008, gunmen seized Nariman House, the city's Chabad Jewish center, and six of its occupants were killed, including Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, who was six months pregnant.
2006Kidnapping and murder of Ilan Halimi. A Paris gang calling itself the "Gang of Barbarians" kidnapped 23-year-old Ilan Halimi and held and tortured him for three weeks; he died of his injuries. Gang members said they targeted Jews because they believed all Jews were rich.
2000Second Intifada. A major Palestinian uprising against Israel and its occupation began in September 2000 and lasted until early 2005. Palestinian militant groups carried out about 138 suicide bombings, mostly against Israeli civilians, and Israel mounted large military operations. About 1,000 Israelis and 3,000 Palestinians, combatants and civilians, were killed.

The full timeline

Jewish background

Jewish fatherDistant from Jewish identity

Ostrom was born Elinor Clair Awan. Her father, Adrian Awan, a Hollywood set designer, was Jewish. Her mother, Leah, was a musician; no source we found describes her as Jewish, and Ostrom said neither parent was particularly religious. After they divorced she was raised by her mother and attended a Protestant church and Sunday school. On weekends she often stayed with her father's sister, who kept a strictly kosher home, and she fondly remembered the serious Friday-night discussions there. Classmates taunted her as Jewish because of her father. No source records her identifying as Jewish or practicing Judaism as an adult.^{[1],[8],[9],[12]}

Key dates

August 7, 1933
Born Elinor Clair Awan in Los Angeles, California.^[1]
1951
Graduates from Beverly Hills High School, where the debate team taught her to argue both sides of policy questions.^[2],[10]
1954
Earns a BA with honors in political science from UCLA in three years, without debt.^[8],[10]
1963
Marries political scientist Vincent Ostrom, one of her professors at UCLA.^[12],[15]
1965
Earns her UCLA PhD with a study of how water users fought seawater intrusion into a Los Angeles groundwater basin; moves to Indiana University.^[2],[6]
1973
Co-founds the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University with Vincent Ostrom.^[10],[11]
1974
Becomes a full professor of political science at Indiana University.^[10]
1978
Publishes, with colleagues, findings from a study of policing across 80 US metropolitan areas.^[4]
1990
Publishes Governing the Commons, setting out the design principles shared by long-lasting community-run resource systems.^{[6],[10],[11]}
2001
Elected to the US National Academy of Sciences.^[10]
October 12, 2009
Becomes the first woman awarded the economics prize, shared with Oliver E. Williamson.^[3],[7]
June 12, 2012
Dies of pancreatic cancer in Bloomington, Indiana, aged 78. A commentary she wrote on grassroots climate action appears in Project Syndicate that day.^{[1],[11],[12],[16]}

Sources

1.Elinor Ostrom - Facts · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
2.Elinor Ostrom - Biographical · NobelPrize.org (The Nobel Foundation, from Les Prix Nobel 2009), 2010
3.The Prize in Economic Sciences 2009 - Press release (12 October 2009) · NobelPrize.org (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences), 2009
4.Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems (Prize Lecture, 8 December 2009) · NobelPrize.org (The Nobel Foundation), 2009
5.Economic governance: the organization of cooperation (Information for the public, Prize in Economic Sciences 2009) · Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, via NobelPrize.org, 2009
6.Scientific Background on the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2009: Economic Governance · Economic Sciences Prize Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, via NobelPrize.org, 2009
7.Nobel Prize awarded women · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
8.Nobel winner Elinor Ostrom is a gregarious teacher who loves to solve problems (Mike Leonard), Wayback Machine snapshot · The Herald-Times (Bloomington, Indiana), 2009
9.Jewish Nobel Prize Winners in Economics (note 17 on Elinor Ostrom) · JINFO.ORG
10.Elinor Ostrom 1933-2012: A Biographical Memoir (Bonnie J. McCay and Joan Bennett), Wayback Machine snapshot · National Academy of Sciences, 2014
11.Elinor Ostrom obituary (Daniel Cole) · The Guardian, 2012
12.Elinor Ostrom dies at 78; first woman to win Nobel in economics (Elaine Woo) · Los Angeles Times, 2012
13.A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management (Cox, Arnold and Villamayor Tomas), Ecology and Society 15(4): 38 · Resilience Alliance (Ecology and Society), 2010
14.How did the United States government and American people respond to Nazism? (Holocaust Encyclopedia) · United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
15.The Ostroms & Our History · Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University
16.Green from the Grassroots (Elinor Ostrom) · Project Syndicate, 2012

Fact-checked on September 24, 2026 by a separate AI fact-checking pass that re-opened the sources, with 7 corrections made. How we check

Suggest a correction