Skip to content
Nobel Jews
Portrait of Otto Meyerhof
Photo: Nobel Foundation, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1922/meyerhof.html · Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine · 1922

Otto Meyerhof

He showed how working muscles get energy from sugar and helped map how cells break it down, then twice fled the Nazis.

The Nobel citation: “for his discovery of the fixed relationship between the consumption of oxygen and the metabolism of lactic acid in the muscle”
Born
April 12, 1884, Hanover, Germany
Died
October 6, 1951, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Shared with
Archibald V. Hill
Affiliation at the time
Kiel University, Germany

Medicine prize

1922

Shared with 1 other laureate.

Age that year

38years

Born in 1884.

Headline credited impact

40,000–135,000people benefited

Cancer patients whose planned care changed after an FDG-PET glucose scan. How it was built

Sources cited

20

Fact-checked September 24, 2026.

  • He trained as a doctor and wrote his thesis on psychiatry before his friend Otto Warburg drew him into the chemistry of living cells.
  • Five years after World War I, he shared the prize with Britain's A.V. Hill; the presenter said great advances do not depend on dividing people into nations.
  • Kiel's faculty denied him a new chair of physiological chemistry, which Germany's national biography blames on antisemitism; even his Nobel Prize won him no promotion there.
  • Four scientists who worked in his laboratory in the 1930s later won Nobel Prizes: Fritz Lipmann, Severo Ochoa, George Wald and André Lwoff.
  • In 1938 he slipped out of Nazi Germany without telling colleagues, leaving his research records behind; in 1940 he fled again, across the Pyrenees.

The breakthrough

The lactic acid cycle in muscle, and mapping how cells break down sugar (1918-1938)

When a muscle works hard, it uses fuel faster than oxygen can arrive. Around 1920 Meyerhof worked out what happens, using muscles taken from frogs. He measured three things together: the muscle's stored sugar, called glycogen, the lactic acid it made, and the oxygen it used. Without oxygen, the muscle turned glycogen into lactic acid in step with the work it did. When oxygen returned, the lactic acid disappeared, but the extra oxygen was only enough to burn about a fifth to a quarter of it. The rest was rebuilt into glycogen, powered by the energy of the part that was burned. Meyerhof liked to compare this to winding a watch: burning a little fuel rewinds the spring for the next burst of work. This fixed link between oxygen use and lactic acid, which fitted A.V. Hill's heat measurements, won the Nobel Prize and was the first evidence that energy in living cells moves in cycles. He then went further. In 1925 he extracted from muscle the set of enzymes that break sugar down without oxygen. Over the next decade his laboratory identified many of the steps and enzymes of this pathway, now called glycolysis or the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway. His assistant Karl Lohmann discovered ATP there in 1929, at the same time as a team at Harvard, and Meyerhof's group showed that breaking down ATP, not making lactic acid, directly powers muscle contraction.[1],[2],[3],[4],[6],[8],[9]

“...in spite of the present political unrest, I have worked in cooperation towards the mutual goal of explaining the process of muscle contraction.”
Otto Meyerhof, Nobel Lecture, 12 December 1923 (English translation), speaking of his British co-laureate A.V. Hill five years after World War I.[3]

What it meant for humanity

Meyerhof helped answer one of biology's basic questions: how does a living cell get usable energy from food? His lactic acid cycle, together with A.V. Hill's heat measurements, showed how a muscle, which cannot work like a steam engine, turns fuel into work through linked chemical reactions. His later work on glycolysis, done alongside the groups of Gustav Embden, Jakub Parnas, Otto Warburg, the Coris and others, laid out step by step how sugar is split. He was convinced that life shares the same basic chemistry, and he showed that muscle and yeast break sugar down in closely similar ways. His lab's work on ATP helped reveal the molecule that carries energy to almost every task in a cell, from moving muscles and firing nerves to pumping substances across membranes and building proteins and DNA. His biographers at the US National Academy of Sciences wrote that working out the glycolytic cycle unlocked how all living cells generate energy. This map is now used far beyond the laboratory. Exercise science builds on his measurements of lactic acid and oxygen, even though later work corrected his view of lactic acid. Cancer imaging uses it too: FDG-PET scans work because hexokinase, the enzyme at the start of glycolysis, which Meyerhof first described in 1927, tags a radioactive sugar with phosphate so that it stays trapped inside glucose-hungry tumours. About 2.2 million FDG-PET/CT scans were done in the United States in 2019, 90% of them for cancer. His influence also spread through the people he trained. Four scientists from his laboratory later won Nobel Prizes, including Fritz Lipmann for coenzyme A and Severo Ochoa for work on how living things build RNA.

  • His Nobel biography credits the finding by Meyerhof and his students that certain phosphate compounds store large amounts of energy with reshaping ideas about muscle contraction and about cell metabolism as a whole.[2]
  • A history published by NobelPrize.org credits his Heidelberg group with identifying over a third of the known enzymes of glycolysis in about eight years; eight other laboratories between them found the remainder.[6]
  • ATP, discovered in his laboratory by Karl Lohmann in 1929 (and independently at Harvard), is now known to supply energy for muscle contraction, nerve signals, membrane transport and the making of proteins and nucleic acids.[6],[8],[9]
  • FDG-PET cancer scans rely on hexokinase, the first enzyme of glycolysis and one Meyerhof first described in 1927, to tag a tracer sugar so it stays trapped in cells; about 2.2 million FDG-PET/CT scans were done in the US in 2019, 90% of them for cancer.[15],[16],[19]
  • Four scientists who worked in his laboratory in the 1930s, Fritz Lipmann, Severo Ochoa, George Wald and André Lwoff, later won Nobel Prizes of their own.[6]

Impact in numbers

Meyerhof's legacy is mostly knowledge. His lactic acid cycle, the glycolysis pathway his laboratory helped assemble and the ATP discovered there are textbook facts about how cells get energy, and they underpin exercise physiology, metabolism research and much of modern biochemistry. Foundations like these feed countless later advances, so most of their value cannot be honestly counted. We record one narrow, low-confidence ripple claim: FDG-PET cancer scans, which work because hexokinase, an enzyme Meyerhof first described in 1927, traps the tracer inside glucose-hungry cells. We use the same outcome and range as the Otto Warburg profile and credit Meyerhof with only 0.5%, because the tracer chemistry, scanners and clinical methods came from many others. We add no harm claim, since no injury to people has been traced to his research, though the view of lactic acid as a waste product, which drew authority from his and Hill's work, misled sport and medicine for decades. His influence also spread through people: four scientists from his laboratory later won Nobel Prizes.

Fundamental scienceHealth

Each number is the laureate’s credited share of a real-world outcome, cumulative to 2025. The whole outcome, the share of credit, and the reasoning are shown so you can check the arithmetic. Outcomes shared with other laureates are counted once on the impact page.

  • Low confidenceRippleModeledHealth

    Cancer patients whose planned care changed after an FDG-PET glucose scan

    40,000–135,000

    people benefited, credited share

    That is 0.5% of 8–27 million people benefited since 1998.

    How this number was built

    Same outcome and range as the Otto Warburg profile: UNSCEAR counts about 40M nuclear medicine scans a year, 17% PET, oncology over 90% of PET in most reporting countries; a ramp-up from 1998 gives 96M-132M PET scans to 2025, 70-85% FDG cancer scans = 67M-112M; at 2.5 (low) or 1.5 (high) scans per patient = 27M-75M patients; the US NOPR registry found plans changed after 36.5% of scans (30% for low) = 8M-27M. Share 0.005: hexokinase, the first enzyme of glycolysis, phosphorylates FDG and the product is trapped. Meyerhof first described hexokinase in 1927, but von Euler and Adler also characterized it (1935), and Sokoloff's method, FDG chemistry, PET scanners, trials and Warburg's tumour finding were each essential. Set below de Hevesy's more direct tracer principle. Shares: Warburg 0.03, de Hevesy 0.01, Meyerhof 0.005. Credited: about 40,000-135,000.[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]

    Sources: Frontiers; Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging; PubMed (US National Library of Medicine); United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; Theranostics (via PubMed Central)

The double edge

No harm to people has been traced to Meyerhof's research. The caveats are scientific. The Hill-Meyerhof theory held that making lactic acid directly powers muscle contraction. In 1930 the Danish physiologist Einar Lundsgaard showed that poisoned muscles can contract without making any lactic acid, and by 1931 Meyerhof had openly dropped the idea; his lab then showed that ATP is the direct power source. A longer-lasting problem was the picture of lactic acid as a waste product of oxygen shortage that causes fatigue. His own cycle had most lactic acid rebuilt into glycogen, not thrown away, yet the 1923 Nobel presentation speech called lactic acid build-up in athletes a kind of poisoning that deserved thought when children compete. The physiologist George Brooks writes that the waste idea lasted for most of the 20th century, that its origin with Meyerhof and Hill made it seem certain, and that Meyerhof's frog preparations, with no blood flow or oxygen supply, could not show what happens in the body. Lactate is now known to be made even when oxygen is plentiful, and to serve as a major fuel and signal.

  • Minor

    The lactic acid theory of contraction was wrong

    For about a decade the Hill-Meyerhof theory held that forming lactic acid directly drives muscle contraction. In 1930 Einar Lundsgaard found that poisoned muscles contract without making lactic acid. Meyerhof welcomed him to Heidelberg to test it, abandoned the theory by 1931, and his lab went on to show that ATP breakdown is the direct energy source.[6],[8]

  • Minor

    A long-lived myth of lactic acid as waste

    For most of the 20th century, Meyerhof's and Hill's work was taken to show that lactate is a useless by-product behind tired, cramping and sore muscles. George Brooks argues that Meyerhof's frog preparations, with no blood flow or oxygen supply, could not represent the living body. Lactate is now seen as a key fuel and signalling molecule.[4],[14]

Against the odds

Meyerhof grew up in a prosperous Jewish family in Berlin, and met prejudice long before Hitler. At Kiel he did his Nobel-winning work as a poorly equipped assistant, largely alone. Yet the faculty refused him a new chair of physiological chemistry. Germany's national biography blames antisemitism, and a history published by NobelPrize.org adds resentment of his pacifism during World War I. Depressed and close to emigrating, he was rescued by Otto Warburg's lobbying, which won him a post in Berlin in 1924. After the Nazis took power in 1933, Jewish scientists were purged from universities across Germany, whose roughly 505,000 Jews made up under 0.75% of the population. From June 1933 the local Nazi party campaigned to remove Meyerhof from his Heidelberg institute. The Kaiser Wilhelm Society shielded him for a time, but he was kept out of the institute's rotating top post. By 1937 his position was precarious. His former assistant David Nachmansohn, writing in code, found him a job in Paris. In 1938 Meyerhof crossed into Switzerland without telling his colleagues, leaving behind his scientific data and belongings. In June 1940 the German invasion of France forced him to flee again, while his son Walter was held in internment camps. With help from Varian Fry's Emergency Rescue Committee and others, Meyerhof and his wife crossed the Pyrenees into Spain and reached the United States; Walter followed in 1941. During the war, nearly 300 of Heidelberg's Jews were deported to the Gurs camp in France.

  • —

    Discrimination

    His Kiel research, done as an assistant with no staff and little space, made him world-famous, yet the faculty passed him over for its new chair of physiological chemistry; Germany's national biography attributes this to antisemitism. A history published by NobelPrize.org adds resentment of his wartime pacifism and says he was denied promotion even after his Nobel Prize.[6],[9]

  • 1933

    Persecution

    From June 1933 the local Nazi party agitated for his removal from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Medical Research in Heidelberg, objecting that a Jewish scientist might become its administrative director. He was kept out of that rotating post, and his standing grew precarious. Germany's Jews then numbered about 505,000, under 0.75% of the population.[7],[12]

  • 1938

    Exile

    With help from his former student Alexander von Muralt, he and his wife crossed into Switzerland and went on to Paris, where David Nachmansohn had arranged a research post. He told no colleagues and had to leave behind his scientific data and possessions.[6],[7],[9]

  • 1940

    War

    When Germany invaded France, the family fled south. Their son Walter was detained at Chambaran and then Le Cheylard until August 1940, and escaped with a forged demobilization paper. Meyerhof was not on the Emergency Rescue Committee's list, but Varian Fry helped him leave anyway.[10],[13],[20]

  • 1940

    Exile

    The Meyerhofs crossed the Pyrenees and Spain to Lisbon and sailed for the United States, where the University of Pennsylvania and the Rockefeller Foundation created a research professorship for him. The family lost almost all its possessions, including his library.[2],[6],[8],[9],[13]

Jewish background

Both parents JewishDistant from Jewish identity

Both parents came from Jewish merchant families: his father Felix was the son of a merchant from Hildesheim, and his mother Bettina May came from a Hamburg merchant family. Germany's national biography lists him as Jewish, and the Hildesheim Meyerhofs were related to the families of fellow biochemists Hans Krebs and Carl Neuberg. In 1914 he married the painter Hedwig Schallenberg. Their three children were raised Lutheran; a memorial for their son Walter says this was to shield them from antisemitism. Biographies describe a life devoted to science, philosophy, art and poetry, and mention no religious practice. The Nazis still persecuted him as Jewish, and he fled Germany in 1938.[2],[6],[7],[9],[10],[11]

Key dates

  1. April 12, 1884

    Born in Hanover, Germany, to Felix Meyerhof, a merchant, and Bettina May; the family moves to Berlin in 1888.[1],[2],[9]

  2. 1909

    Graduates in medicine at Heidelberg with a thesis on psychiatry, then joins Ludolf von Krehl's clinic, where Otto Warburg steers him toward cell chemistry.[2],[8]

  3. 1912

    Moves to the University of Kiel's Institute of Physiology, qualifying as a lecturer in physiology in 1913.[2],[9]

  4. 1914

    Marries the painter Hedwig Schallenberg; they have three children, Gottfried, Bettina and Walter.[2],[9],[10]

  5. 1918

    Becomes assistant professor at Kiel and begins the frog muscle studies linking oxygen use to lactic acid.[2],[6],[9]

  6. October 25, 1923

    Awarded half of the reserved 1922 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, shared with A.V. Hill; he is 39.[1],[4],[5],[8]

  7. 1924

    After Otto Warburg lobbies for him, joins the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Biology in Berlin-Dahlem as head of a division.[2],[6],[8]

  8. 1925

    Extracts from muscle the enzyme system that breaks glycogen down to lactic acid, opening the way to mapping glycolysis.[2],[8]

  9. 1929

    His assistant Karl Lohmann reports the discovery of ATP; Meyerhof moves to Heidelberg to head the Physiology Institute of the new Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Medical Research.[2],[6],[9]

  10. June 1933

    The local Nazi party begins agitating for his removal from the Heidelberg institute because he is Jewish.[7]

  11. 1938

    Flees Nazi Germany via Switzerland to Paris, becoming director of research at the Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique.[2],[7],[9]

  12. 1940

    Flees France after the German invasion, crossing the Pyrenees to Spain and Lisbon, and becomes a research professor at the University of Pennsylvania.[2],[6],[10]

  13. 1949

    Elected to the US National Academy of Sciences.[8]

  14. October 6, 1951

    Dies of a heart attack in Philadelphia, aged 67, after some 400 scientific publications.[1],[2],[8]

Sources

  1. 1.Otto Meyerhof - Facts · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
  2. 2.Otto Meyerhof - Biographical (from Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1922-1941) · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach), 1965
  3. 3.Energy conversions in muscle (Nobel Lecture, 12 December 1923) · Nobel Foundation, 1923
  4. 4.Award ceremony speech, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1922 (Professor J.E. Johansson) · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach), 1923
  5. 5.The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1922 - Summary · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
  6. 6.Otto Meyerhof and the Physiology Institute: the Birth of Modern Biochemistry · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
  7. 7.Personal and National Tragedy Undermine Krehl's Dream · NobelPrize.org (Nobel Prize Outreach)
  8. 8.Otto Meyerhof, 1884-1951: A Biographical Memoir (David Nachmansohn, Severo Ochoa and Fritz A. Lipmann) · National Academy of Sciences, 1960
  9. 9.Meyerhof, Otto (by Michael Engel), Neue Deutsche Biographie 17, 1994 · Deutsche Biographie (Historische Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften), 1994
  10. 10.Studio portrait of Nobel laureate, Otto Meyerhof (photo record with Meyerhof family biography) · United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  11. 11.Walter E. Meyerhof memorial · Palo Alto Online
  12. 12.Germany: Jewish Population in 1933 · United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Holocaust Encyclopedia
  13. 13.German city honors Jews who fled (Lauren Bottner) · Jewish Journal, 2011
  14. 14.The tortuous path of lactate shuttle discovery: From cinders and boards to the lab and ICU (George A. Brooks), Journal of Sport and Health Science 9(5) · Journal of Sport and Health Science (via PubMed Central), 2020
  15. 15.Moonlighting Proteins: The Case of the Hexokinases (Rodríguez-Saavedra et al.), Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 8 · Frontiers, 2021
  16. 16.Gallagher's Principle of Metabolic Trapping (Steven M. Larson), Journal of Nuclear Medicine 61 Suppl 2 · Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2020
  17. 17.Impact of PET/CT and PET alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry (Hillner et al.), J Clin Oncol 26(13) · PubMed (US National Library of Medicine), 2008
  18. 18.UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report, Annex A: Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation · United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2022
  19. 19.FDG uptake in cancer: a continuing debate (Peppicelli et al.), Theranostics 10(7) · Theranostics (via PubMed Central), 2020
  20. 20.Rescuing the Nazis' "most wanted" (George Rupp) · International Rescue Committee, 2008

Fact-checked on September 24, 2026 by a separate AI fact-checking pass that re-opened the sources, with 7 corrections made. How we check

Suggest a correction